GroupWise Messenger Conversation History for Chad Masching
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:54:09 PM): any luck with the uTX runs?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:55:04 PM): i’m doing them as we discusse yesterday… really four separate runs for each one
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:55:27 PM): I’m not sure yet of it is better to combine an dheave 1 export, or 4 dxks
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:55:53 PM): did you get a chance to look at that template and mockup i sent?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:56:00 PM): still pretty rough
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:56:22 PM): i read through your process
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:56:34 PM): i’m sure emilie is going to want to tear it to shreds
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:57:02 PM): can’t wait. that’s why i only did one tab. she can do the whole thing if she wants
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:57:15 PM): lets see what happens
———————————————–
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 10:15:22 AM): so, if 262 needs to be redone, do we have anything that is “done” and ready for cad?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:20 AM): nope
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:29 AM): we changed our analyses yesterday evening
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:44 AM): i’ll have 262 ready soon
———————————————–
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 10:17:10 AM): ok. let me know when it’s a go
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 12:16:27 PM): how is 262 coming? I need to keep drafting busy
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 3:42:45 PM): Chad Masching (Denver) logged out at 3:42:45 PM.
———————————————–
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:01:55 AM): do you see any issues if we chop off the “pore pressure” column from the utexas4 output table?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:02:05 AM): it doesn’t really work when we combine outputs
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:14 AM): i know
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:21 AM): that is one issue
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:46 AM): “they” want evidence that we really did use seepage forces and/or pore pressures
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:04:48 AM): i think we handle it in that note 5 that i added
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:02 AM): we don;t need the table at all
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:18 AM): this is one issue that we discussed reviously
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:27 AM): with URS decreeing that we need to show UTexas output table
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:05:36 AM): “WE” don’t. does DWR “need” the table?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:14:25 AM): whats ure extension?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:14:41 AM): im at 81022 today
———————————————–
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:57:16 PM): How are we sitting on additional completed sections?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:57:34 PM): ive completed 5
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:57:53 PM): 5 more, or 5 total?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:51 PM): driss is working on 4
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:54 PM): deb on 1
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:57 PM): total = 10
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:59 PM): so far
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:59:12 PM): thanks. will talk to amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:59:55 PM): i have bgc meeting rest of day
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 2:00:28 PM): enjoy. i became greater yesterday
———————————————–
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:47 AM): i am not sure if it is top or bottom point
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:53 AM): but whichever it is
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:58 AM): i suggest moving it in CAD
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:20:04 AM): based on SEEP/CAD section