GroupWise Messenger Conversation History for Amber Misgen x1048

Amber Misgen (Denver) (4/21/2008 3:54:20 PM): Amber Misgen (Denver) logged out at 3:54:20 PM.
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/22/2008 3:30:44 PM): hey amber
Amber Misgen (Denver) (4/22/2008 4:39:33 PM): Are you still there Jeff?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/22/2008 4:39:38 PM): yes
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (5/28/2008 1:11:33 PM): what stations have you completed the seepage for?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:11:45 PM): 4215+61,
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:11:48 PM): 262+62
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:11:53 PM): 7728+50
Amber Misgen (Denver) (5/28/2008 1:13:03 PM): thank you!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:21:21 PM): ANY OTHERS?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:21:28 PM): OR START UTEXAS?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (5/28/2008 1:21:32 PM): (SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS)
Amber Misgen (Denver) (5/28/2008 1:22:50 PM): byran and I are hoping to have things checked in the immedate future so that UTexas can start Monday. Past that no more at the moment
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:55:58 PM): hey Jeff– question about the cad import of seep points?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:56:06 PM): export rather.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:56:22 PM): HI
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:57:32 PM): Hi! When you bring points directy into seep from cad, does seep round those numbers off or is it up to the analyst to simpify the points once in cad?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:57:36 PM): once in seep.
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:57:59 PM): I need to slow down!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:13 PM): I SIMPLIFY
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:15 PM): IN SEEP
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:30 PM): BY GOING TO KEYIN POINTS
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:40 PM): AND ROUNDING EVERY POINT TO NEAREST TENTH
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:43 PM): TAKES ABOUT 5 MIN
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:58:50 PM): LESS
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:59:16 PM): we figured that that is easiest way
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 1:59:26 PM): it would take a half-hour in cad
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 1:59:46 PM): Oh I agree.. I’m just trying to find out where some errors are coming from.. a 18.5 in cad is in seep as 16..
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 2:00:22 PM): human…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 2:00:34 PM): unless it’s mine
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/3/2008 2:00:42 PM): then its computer or reviewer error
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 2:00:49 PM): nice
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 2:01:07 PM): thanks for the clarification, i was just trying to figure out where the error is…
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/3/2008 2:01:18 PM): and nope not your section 🙂
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/5/2008 10:50:58 AM): q
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/5/2008 10:51:11 AM): Are we not using a tri-linear envelope for soft clay?
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 12:07:22 PM): Hi Jeff — deb has just been okayed to export the dxf’s for 4157+39– so you can add that section to your list for Utexas runs… amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 12:41:14 PM): yeppers
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:27:54 PM): can u remind me…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:28:02 PM): of the sections that are ready for UTExas…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:28:06 PM): 262+26
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 1:28:14 PM): 262+26
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:28:15 PM): 4157+39
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 1:28:18 PM): 4021+72
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 1:28:21 PM): 4157+39
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:28:25 PM): three?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/6/2008 1:28:29 PM): ok
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 1:28:40 PM): yes
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/6/2008 4:02:23 PM): Amber Misgen (Denver) logged out at 4:02:23 PM.
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:03 AM): can u see the prvious converse
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:48:18 AM): I can not
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:32 AM): …
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:33 AM): Robert Rucker (9:29:36 AM): I am looking at SJAFCA section 7728+50, is there going to further analysis done for the Ditch full and Ditch empty scenarios?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:50 AM): i’m unsure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:54 AM): im Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:58 AM): IM amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:30:02 AM): i’m not Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:30:10 AM): but you should instant message Amber
Robert Rucker (9:39:11 AM): Did you do the seepage analysis on 7728+50?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:40:49 AM): yes
Robert Rucker (9:43:04 AM): Can you ouptut the ditch full head countour again with the flow path included?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:43:33 AM): did i run ditch full?
Robert Rucker (9:44:40 AM): If you didn’t someone else did
Robert Rucker (9:45:13 AM): Are you in Sacramento today?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:45:21 AM): yes
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:54 AM): did deb run ditch full?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:49:38 AM): No Driss completed the analyses at 7728+50,
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:49:45 AM): including a full ditch
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:49:51 AM): okay
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:02 AM): so i’ll ask Robert to contact Driss
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:16 AM): do you have his phone?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:50:23 AM): yes 8 1030
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:28 AM): thanks
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:50:31 AM): anytime
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:35:00 AM): we have 10 sections complete or nearing completion
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:35:03 AM): is that all of them?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/23/2008 10:54:25 AM): there are 12 priority stability sections..
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:54:36 AM): so two are outstanding
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (7/29/2008 1:22:08 PM): hey there.. question for you!!
Amber Misgen (Denver) (7/29/2008 2:52:54 PM): Amber Misgen (Denver) logged out at 2:52:54 PM.
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:21:15 AM): AHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:21:25 AM): hello
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:23:59 AM): Hi there.. Do you recall if you ran the analysis for 4052+95?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:24:22 AM): the cad figure seems to have the incorrect phreatic surface
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:24:32 AM): i think so
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:25:03 AM): If i Send you an email, could you take alook and see what may have happened?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:25:08 AM): sure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:38:17 AM): So the Seep/W file is correct
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:38:39 AM): yes.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:40:46 AM): I don’t think I ran the latest runs of Utexas for this section (the file naming is off)
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:40:47 AM): however
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:40:57 AM): the model uses Elev = 16
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:41:07 AM): which is the top of levee
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:41:11 AM): and not the top of wall
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:41:45 AM): are you swamped right now?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:41:53 AM): i could do something
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:42:13 AM): either driss or deb prb ran these
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:42:18 AM): what do u need?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:42:47 AM): Would you re run the utexas suite for this section?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:42:57 AM): ok
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:43:36 AM): thanks.. there will be less checking if someone with your skills runs them 🙂
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:43:43 AM): so we need, TOP of Levee circular landside/waterside and wedge waterside
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:43:57 AM): that is what you sent me
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:44:00 AM): in the pdf
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:44:06 AM): should I replace those three?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:44:16 AM): Actually…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:44:28 AM): the rapiddrawdown needs to be changed too
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:45:28 AM): we will need to run them acording to your Flow chart of criteria, and once the TOL is done, we may or may not need to run TOL-2 and TOL-4 depending on the FOS.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:45:57 AM): okay
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:46:20 AM): (by the way, this is the first I’ve heard of TOL-2, etc.)
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:47:07 AM): no worries.. If you’ll send me the FOS for each of your analysis I’ll fill you in on the TOL minus situation.
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 8:47:18 AM): as needed
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 8:47:30 AM): ok
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:17:09 AM): Files and DXFs located…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:17:10 AM): \064592_TO16_SJAFCA\Preliminary Analyses\4052+95_D_ST\Utexas4\JBW
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:17:45 AM): Crest – LS – Circular – 1.11
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:18:04 AM): Crest – LS – Wedge – 1.09
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:18:24 AM): RDD – WS – Circular – 1.02
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:19:07 AM): hold on — i need to fix that last one
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:21:33 AM): RDD – WS – Circular – 1.12
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:21:48 AM): RDD – WS – Wedge – 1.18
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 10:22:41 AM): Great thanks, Now….for each of the analyses you just ran, we’ll need to run them again at two different water levels, TOL-2 ft and TOL -4 ft. with out regard to the flow chart criteria.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:23:15 AM): with what phreatic surface?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 10:24:15 AM): the seepage is already completed and Deb should have a file exported.
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 10:24:21 AM): already.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:24:24 AM): ok
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:24:40 AM): and those runs were never completed?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 10:24:45 AM): utexas, i mean
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 10:25:48 AM): there were utexas runs made, but they were using the wrong phreatic surfaces according to the dxf outputs. The existing “minus” runs should be inside the utexas “extra” folder
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 11:24:24 AM): Amber Misgen (Denver) logged out at 11:24:24 AM.
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:27:33 PM): the rdd’s don’t need to be re-done, correct?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:27:47 PM): RDD (minus 2) and RDD (minus 4)
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:27:56 PM): there is only one RDD, right?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 3:28:56 PM): Yes there is only 1 rdd for the -2 and -4 ::: waterside circular
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 3:29:45 PM): yes the rdd needs to be redone using the piezo surface from seep/w reflecting the presence of the wall.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:31:20 PM): Yea, but there is only one RDD — for TOL — and not for TOL (minus 2) and TOL (minus 4)… correct?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:31:31 PM): Deb has RDD’s for those as well
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 3:33:37 PM): ohh .. No. because of the FS obtained in your analyses 1.18, we now need the -2 and -4 analyses for the wedge and circular rapid drawdown cases.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:33:52 PM): ok
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:34:10 PM): those FS will increase
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 3:35:16 PM): yep.. Bryan set the criteria for the TOL results for the rapid drawdown needing MINUS analyses between 0.8 and 1.2, so your results need MINUS analyses
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 3:36:06 PM): thanks
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 4:13:40 PM): hey sorry for delay
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 4:13:49 PM): all files completed / dxfed
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/11/2008 4:17:23 PM): Awesome.. THank you so much for your help!!!!!!!!!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 4:17:40 PM): no prb
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 4:17:43 PM): it was a pleasure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/11/2008 4:18:09 PM): i look forward to learning more about this TOL (minus 2) and TOL (minus 4) stuff
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/14/2008 8:25:08 AM): hey
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/14/2008 8:25:13 AM): u need me to run these?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/14/2008 8:39:04 AM): is deb running 4157+39?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/14/2008 8:41:34 AM): Deb just called and said he would run them.. thanks though.
Amber Misgen (Denver) (8/14/2008 8:41:50 AM): I was just trying to see who would be in 1st this morning.. 🙂
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/14/2008 8:43:02 AM): good strategy
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/17/2008 7:57:13 AM): hey amber
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/17/2008 7:57:19 AM): Halo
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/17/2008 7:57:34 AM): you received that email from Ani?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/17/2008 7:57:44 AM): sure did.. j
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/17/2008 7:57:53 AM): in the GER analysis folder, there is a SeepW folder
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/17/2008 7:57:56 AM): just waiting for my super slow sac connection to open up!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/17/2008 7:58:15 AM): In there are the SeepW template and the K-Sat values chart
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/17/2008 7:58:36 AM): the section-specific info is in the individual section folders
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/17/2008 7:59:11 AM): excellent
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:19:15 AM): hey amber
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/24/2008 9:24:28 AM): hola senor
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:24:38 AM): how is your time?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:24:47 AM): could you do another section or two?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/24/2008 9:24:56 AM): I would love to
Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/24/2008 9:25:18 AM): Time is all I have these days!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:25:42 AM): haha
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:25:48 AM): i will send you two sections shortly
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 9:55:33 AM): 1255+91
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) (9/24/2008 10:02:11 AM): alrighty
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/24/2008 10:02:50 AM): great
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/26/2008 10:22:51 AM): 1117+14
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/26/2008 10:23:12 AM): sounds good.. is this afternoon ok?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/26/2008 10:42:24 AM): yea
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/26/2008 10:50:41 AM): be sure to use the Revised 1117+14 SeepW Model pdf for your model
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/26/2008 10:50:52 AM): no problem
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/29/2008 2:33:18 PM): hey there…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/29/2008 2:33:23 PM): hey
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/29/2008 2:33:59 PM): I’m wondering if you know any secret tricks when importing Geostudio won’t recoginze the regions drawn in cad ??
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/29/2008 2:39:06 PM): reboot = no problem.. sorry for bothering you!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/29/2008 2:39:20 PM): that is no problem
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/29/2008 2:39:40 PM): i mean you werent bothering me, reboot is no problem
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/29/2008 2:40:02 PM): no worries..
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/29/2008 2:40:29 PM): haha
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:20:43 PM): amber
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:20:53 PM): what’s up….
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:20:56 PM): could you re-run 1030+26
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:20:58 PM): with…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:21:04 PM): 39% fines for the upper SM
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:21:11 PM): and 42% fines for the lower
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:21:20 PM): I sent you 39/24
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:21:27 PM): it should be 42/39
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:21:49 PM): no problem!
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:23:18 PM): upper 42%
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:23:23 PM): lower 39%
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:23:25 PM): is that correct
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:23:32 PM): ?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:23:44 PM): upper 39
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:23:51 PM): lower 42
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:24:49 PM): got in
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 12:24:52 PM): it
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 12:27:37 PM): i placed a Corrected SeepW model pdf in the folder
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 1:13:13 PM): Hi Jeff… I saved the updated files to the sac server- your exit gradients came down a hair.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 1:16:32 PM): hey
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 1:16:39 PM): yes???
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 1:16:44 PM): can u add those two points in addition to the others
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 1:16:52 PM): of course
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 1:16:56 PM): thank you
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 1:17:01 PM): my pleasure
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 2:57:23 PM): have u been exporting flow vectors to dxf for head?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 2:57:28 PM): i forgot to include that
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 2:57:45 PM): I hadn’t been, but it is no biggie to simply re do the Head dxfs
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 2:57:48 PM): by default, doesn’t everything get exported
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 2:58:08 PM): could u open up one of your files and turn on all layers?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 2:58:12 PM): and see what is there
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 2:58:46 PM): it will export only the layers (if you will) you see on your monitor at the time of export
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:01:07 PM): ure right
Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 3:01:10 PM): ok open and all turned on
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:01:22 PM): yea i tried it too
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:01:35 PM): there are some extras, but no flow vectors
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:01:52 PM): (for example, the mesh comes along by default)_
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:02:04 PM): but since flow vectors must be turned on, it doesnt go
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:02:11 PM): thank u
———————————————–

Amber Misgen (Denver) x1048 (9/30/2008 3:02:24 PM): no worries.. fun with Seep 😉
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9/30/2008 3:02:30 PM): haha
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:26:27 AM): hey amber
Amber Misgen x1048 (10/20/2008 8:26:44 AM): good morning!
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:26:59 AM): did babi email u>
Amber Misgen x1048 (10/20/2008 8:27:18 AM): he did.. I actually just opened it up
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:27:53 AM): he’s asking you to re-do a section taht was initially completed by deb
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:28:11 AM): could you8 bill your time to the Mitigation task
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:28:23 AM): as seepage io all out of money
Amber Misgen x1048 (10/20/2008 8:28:41 AM): no worries.. I won’t have time to get to it until tomorrow, When do you need it by?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:28:57 AM): wednesday at the latest
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:29:04 AM): hopefully
Amber Misgen x1048 (10/20/2008 8:29:19 AM): I’ll do it first thing tomorrow morning…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:29:22 AM): great
Jeffrey Wisniewski (10/20/2008 8:29:25 AM): thank you
Amber Misgen x1048 (10/20/2008 8:29:30 AM): anytime!
———————————————–

Amber Misgen x1048 (7/6/2009 9:31:05 AM): Hey Jeff! Do you know if there is a way to combine analyses from different geostudio files into a single file?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:31:17 AM): hi amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:31:27 AM): i’m not sure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:32:27 AM): i don’t remember there being such an option, but i never tried
Amber Misgen x1048 (7/6/2009 9:32:53 AM): I haven’t found anything – but thought I’d check. Thanks.