GroupWise Messenger Conversation History for Kristopher Van Sant

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:05:20 AM): kris
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:06:28 AM): Hey Jeff, how’s the patio coming?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:10:16 AM): are u in sac?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:10:19 AM): or oak?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:10:27 AM): im hungry for a burrito
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:16:48 AM): Haha, I am in Sac
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:16:52 AM): u?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:20:57 AM): no
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:21:01 AM): hey
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:21:10 AM): did you do the BGC homework?
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:22:00 AM): Yeah of course…didn’t u?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:27:24 AM): which one did you do
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:27:54 AM): did we only need to do 10 or 12
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:28:01 AM): or did w have to do all of them
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:28:58 AM): I’m just kidding, I haven’t looked at it. I figured I would do it tonight.
Kristopher Van Sant (6/17/2008 10:48:43 AM): And I believe that it was just one of them
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 10:57:11 AM): the deck/arbor is coming — purchased the wood, staining; posts should go up Thursday or Friday
————————————
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:23:44 AM): dude
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:23:50 AM): do you have a cable toner?
Kristopher Van Sant (12/31/2008 11:24:01 AM): cable toner?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:24:45 AM): yea, you send a signal (or tone) in one end of a cable, and with a reader, you can follow that signal
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:24:54 AM): do you have one?
Kristopher Van Sant (12/31/2008 11:25:18 AM): no I don’t think so
————————————
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:32:39 AM): vansant
Kristopher Van Sant (12/31/2008 11:32:59 AM): wisniewski
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:33:03 AM): mehicana
Kristopher Van Sant (12/31/2008 11:33:13 AM): si senor
Kristopher Van Sant (12/31/2008 11:33:19 AM): let me get this stuff done tho
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:33:28 AM): ok
————————————
Jeffrey Wisniewski (1/30/2009 9:11:10 AM): van sant
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:11:27 AM): wisniewski
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:11:48 AM): hows it going?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (1/30/2009 9:11:56 AM): its good to see you are still alive
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:12:15 AM): yeah they decided to hole me up out in the field office again for a while
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:13:34 AM): I was kinda pissed when I wasn’t able to make those last two seminars
Jeffrey Wisniewski (1/30/2009 9:13:47 AM): yea, it pissed off a lot of people
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:14:02 AM): hahaha
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:14:43 AM): were they good sessions?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (1/30/2009 9:18:30 AM): yea, probably the best lectures ever
Kristopher Van Sant (1/30/2009 9:19:09 AM): see thats what i figured
————————————
Jeffrey Wisniewski (1/30/2009 3:47:57 PM): you ever use your skills to determin jukes’ age
————————————
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:18:40 AM): kvs
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:20:33 AM): wisniewski
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:20:53 AM): j dub
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:21:24 AM): you’re still alive
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:21:27 AM): so ive been in sac all week, you don’t work here anymore or what?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:21:43 AM): i heard the wanket clamoring away a week or so ago
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:21:56 AM): about what?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:21:59 AM): i hope you weren’t on the receiving end
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:22:08 AM): some values in the construction report
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:22:21 AM): ohhhh no luckily that wasn’t me
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:22:33 AM): it was Garrett, don, and john
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:25:40 AM): that is what i thought
————————————
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:28:45 AM): it is because of that meeting that I have been in Sac all week reviewing every part of the construction report
Jeffrey Wisniewski (4/2/2009 10:34:45 AM): quit your bitching
————————————
Kristopher Van Sant (4/2/2009 10:41:10 AM): hahaha its actually been nice being in sac for a little while

GroupWise Messenger Conversation History for Robert Rucker x4554

Robert Rucker (6/10/2008 9:29:36 AM): I am looking at SJAFCA section 7728+50, is there going to further analysis done for the Ditch full and Ditch empty scenarios?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:29:50 AM): i’m unsure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:29:54 AM): im Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:29:58 AM): IM amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:30:02 AM): i’m not Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:30:10 AM): but you should instant message Amber
Robert Rucker (6/10/2008 9:39:11 AM): Did you do the seepage analysis on 7728+50?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:40:49 AM): yes
Robert Rucker (6/10/2008 9:43:04 AM): Can you ouptut the ditch full head countour again with the flow path included?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:43:33 AM): did i run ditch full?
Robert Rucker (6/10/2008 9:44:40 AM): If you didn’t someone else did
Robert Rucker (6/10/2008 9:45:13 AM): Are you in Sacramento today?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:45:21 AM): yes
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:45:43 AM): Has joined the conversation.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:03 AM): can u see the prvious converse
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:48:18 AM): I can not
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:32 AM): …
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:33 AM): Robert Rucker (9:29:36 AM): I am looking at SJAFCA section 7728+50, is there going to further analysis done for the Ditch full and Ditch empty scenarios?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:50 AM): i’m unsure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:54 AM): im Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:29:58 AM): IM amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:30:02 AM): i’m not Amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:30:10 AM): but you should instant message Amber
Robert Rucker (9:39:11 AM): Did you do the seepage analysis on 7728+50?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:40:49 AM): yes
Robert Rucker (9:43:04 AM): Can you ouptut the ditch full head countour again with the flow path included?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:43:33 AM): did i run ditch full?
Robert Rucker (9:44:40 AM): If you didn’t someone else did
Robert Rucker (9:45:13 AM): Are you in Sacramento today?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (9:45:21 AM): yes
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:48:54 AM): did deb run ditch full?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:49:38 AM): No Driss completed the analyses at 7728+50,
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:49:45 AM): including a full ditch
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:49:51 AM): okay
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:02 AM): so i’ll ask Robert to contact Driss
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:16 AM): do you have his phone?
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:50:23 AM): yes 8 1030
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/10/2008 9:50:28 AM): thanks
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:50:31 AM): anytime
Amber Misgen (Denver) (6/10/2008 9:50:36 AM): Has left the conversation.
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:51:42 PM): hey ruck
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:51:54 PM): yes
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:52:12 PM): hey
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:52:26 PM): hey
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:52:30 PM): i’ve asked karen to get some data for a section to be drawn
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:52:30 PM): whats up
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:52:34 PM): can you draw it up
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:52:43 PM): a cross section?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:52:46 PM): marysville Boring 109
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:52:48 PM): yes
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:53:04 PM): sure
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:10 PM): okay
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:19 PM): she will be sending info to you maybe later today
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:27 PM): can you get something drawn by tmw am?
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:53:44 PM): should be no problem
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:49 PM): great
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:52 PM): thanks
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:55 PM): let menow
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/19/2008 3:53:58 PM): know
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:53:59 PM): np
Robert Rucker (6/19/2008 3:54:08 PM): will do
———————————————–

Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 8:47:18 AM): Ehats the task number for Marysville?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:47:36 AM): one sec
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:48:54 AM): 064590
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:49:37 AM): 2610
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 8:49:45 AM): thanks
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:50:38 AM): any update
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 8:52:18 AM): I am working on it right now, I have not gotten the gINT out put yet. Will give you an update in 30
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:53:25 AM): talk to lacy
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 8:54:01 AM): yeah she said she would have it for me this morning.
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 8:56:19 AM): Is tehre a station for this cross section?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:59:05 AM): you ask too many questions
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 8:59:19 AM): one sec
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:05:30 AM): one minute…
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:12:32 AM): hold on
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:12:40 AM): i can barely connect to SAC
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 9:13:17 AM): I can rename it later.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:13:45 AM): ‘yea, it is taking me forever to download these plans
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:13:51 AM): 30mb in 6 minutes
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 9:14:13 AM): karen might be able to giv eit to me
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:14:23 AM): o
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:14:27 AM): oh
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 9:18:27 AM): i dont see it on th eplans anyway
———————————————–

Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 9:24:30 AM): 1280+72
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 10:50:03 AM): great
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 10:50:16 AM): (that was a delayed response)
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 10:50:34 AM): seriously
———————————————–

Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 11:35:09 AM): alright there is a pdf in:
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 11:35:10 AM): \J:\DWR\Project\URS-Geo Lev Invst\064590 TO26 Marysville Phase 2&3\5000 Technical Info. and Data\5400-X Boring and CPT Logs\40 gINT Profiles\GER LiDAR Cross Sections\Section Pdfs
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 11:35:36 AM): or a Working CAD file in:
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 11:35:37 AM): J:\DWR\Project\URS-Geo Lev Invst\064590 TO26 Marysville Phase 2&3\5000 Technical Info. and Data\5400-X Boring and CPT Logs\40 gINT Profiles\GER LiDAR Cross Sections\Working CAD files for Analysts
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/20/2008 11:35:41 AM): thank you!
Robert Rucker (6/20/2008 11:35:45 AM): np
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 9:58:53 AM): ruck
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 9:59:04 AM): Do you need another cross section?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 9:59:27 AM): is there a reason i cannot do anything — even open — the files in that Working CAD files folder
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 9:59:41 AM): what is the error?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 9:59:50 AM): no error
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:00:02 AM): i cannot drag a copy to my local drive
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:00:05 AM): let me try to open it up.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:00:06 AM): or even open the cad
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:00:17 AM): hmm strange
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:02:53 AM): Thats wierd it like the file is corrupt or something, Let me rebuild it and I will send you a copy
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:03:01 AM): great
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:03:03 AM): thank you
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:03:10 AM): np
———————————————–

Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:12:51 AM): I talked to Bruce and he said he thinks it has to do with the long filename.
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:12:59 AM): hmmm….
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:14:06 AM): I am going to try to rename the folder and the file itself and see if the helps, It won’t follow Emilies naming convension, oh well
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:14:07 AM): i guess he means with all the folders etc.
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:14:13 AM): yeah
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:14:18 AM): or email me the file for now
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:14:28 AM): i’m going to do an analysis on it
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:14:35 AM): I will try that first
Robert Rucker (6/23/2008 10:15:21 AM): just sent it
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/23/2008 10:17:04 AM): thank you
———————————————–

Robert Rucker (7/31/2008 2:02:07 PM): Did you work on teh new Seepage Analysis for SJAFCA, specifically for station 262+26?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:02:40 PM): i think so
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:02:47 PM): not the “new” seepage
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:02:52 PM): ??
Robert Rucker (7/31/2008 2:04:19 PM): I am doing more figures, they just sent me 2ft and 4 ft from Levee top analysis
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:05:18 PM): no
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:05:24 PM): i wasn’t a part of that
Robert Rucker (7/31/2008 2:05:42 PM): some of thoke gradient files do
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:06:20 PM): thoke?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:06:31 PM): im at x2926
Robert Rucker (7/31/2008 2:06:33 PM): never mind
Robert Rucker (7/31/2008 2:07:04 PM): I will get it worked out and let you know if I need anythign
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/31/2008 2:07:38 PM): okay
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:40:34 AM): ruck
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:40:36 AM): mehicana
Jeffrey Wisniewski (12/31/2008 11:40:46 AM): are you interasado?
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:44:56 AM): hey rucker
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:45:12 AM): whats up?
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:45:52 AM): someone changed the name of the PG&E folder
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:45:57 AM): is the database effected?
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:46:24 AM): it might be.
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:46:54 AM): the table are linked. I will take a look
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:47:04 AM): Do you have it open
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:47:06 AM): no
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:47:16 AM): wait 1
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:47:18 AM): the original foler was PG&E Projects 2009
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:47:25 AM): Now it is 2009 PG&E Projects
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:47:33 AM): I am not sure who changed thame, or why
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:47:37 AM): *the name
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:49:16 AM): Looks like everything is fine. Path is still the same on the SAC server
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:49:22 AM): oh
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:49:23 AM): ok
Jeffrey Wisniewski (7/6/2009 9:49:32 AM): i thought it was on OAK server
Robert Rucker x4554 (7/6/2009 9:50:00 AM): no
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/7/2009 4:36:56 PM): hey ruck!
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/7/2009 4:37:07 PM): yeah
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/7/2009 4:37:31 PM): after the serer migrationm
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/7/2009 4:37:45 PM): we will need to update the server path for the database, currently //sacsrv/
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/7/2009 4:37:50 PM): *server
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/7/2009 4:38:44 PM): Either I can do it on Monday morning and redistribute teh fron end or I can walk you through it
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/7/2009 4:38:54 PM): ok
———————————————–

Robert Rucker x4554 (8/7/2009 4:42:10 PM): have a good weekend
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:07:38 AM): hey ruck
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:07:58 AM): could you update the frontend?
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/10/2009 10:07:59 AM): hey, I will take care of that font end right now
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:08:02 AM): the new server is sac1v-fs01
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:08:05 AM): cool
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:08:14 AM): i’m going to get Matt Powers working on it too
———————————————–

Robert Rucker x4554 (8/10/2009 10:16:11 AM): it automatically updated for me, give it s shot
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:17:39 AM): no go
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:17:52 AM): says \\sacsrv\DATA\… is not a vaild path
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/10/2009 10:18:19 AM): maybe julie did it take a copy from the project folder
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:22:21 AM): i did
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:22:27 AM): \\oak1v-fs01\DATA\Projects\2009 PG&E PROJECTS\09119-1 PG&E Motherlode & DeSabla Watershed\7.0 Database-K
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/10/2009 10:23:05 AM): Julie is putting it out on th eproject folder on the OAK server. I don’t have access to it anymore
Robert Rucker x4554 (8/10/2009 10:23:25 AM): She will send notice when it is there
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 10:23:29 AM): ok
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 4:15:39 PM): the new tracker is calling J-drive
Jeffrey Wisniewski (8/10/2009 4:15:43 PM): we need absolute file path

GroupWise Messenger Conversation History for Chad Masching

Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:54:09 PM): any luck with the uTX runs?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:55:04 PM): i’m doing them as we discusse yesterday… really four separate runs for each one
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:55:27 PM): I’m not sure yet of it is better to combine an dheave 1 export, or 4 dxks
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:55:53 PM): did you get a chance to look at that template and mockup i sent?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:56:00 PM): still pretty rough
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:56:22 PM): i read through your process
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:56:34 PM): i’m sure emilie is going to want to tear it to shreds
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/4/2008 2:57:02 PM): can’t wait. that’s why i only did one tab. she can do the whole thing if she wants
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/4/2008 2:57:15 PM): lets see what happens
———————————————–

Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 10:15:22 AM): so, if 262 needs to be redone, do we have anything that is “done” and ready for cad?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:20 AM): nope
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:29 AM): we changed our analyses yesterday evening
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/13/2008 10:16:44 AM): i’ll have 262 ready soon
———————————————–

Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 10:17:10 AM): ok. let me know when it’s a go
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 12:16:27 PM): how is 262 coming? I need to keep drafting busy
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/13/2008 3:42:45 PM): Chad Masching (Denver) logged out at 3:42:45 PM.
———————————————–

Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:01:55 AM): do you see any issues if we chop off the “pore pressure” column from the utexas4 output table?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:02:05 AM): it doesn’t really work when we combine outputs
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:14 AM): i know
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:21 AM): that is one issue
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:04:46 AM): “they” want evidence that we really did use seepage forces and/or pore pressures
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:04:48 AM): i think we handle it in that note 5 that i added
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:02 AM): we don;t need the table at all
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:18 AM): this is one issue that we discussed reviously
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:05:27 AM): with URS decreeing that we need to show UTexas output table
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:05:36 AM): “WE” don’t. does DWR “need” the table?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/17/2008 11:14:25 AM): whats ure extension?
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/17/2008 11:14:41 AM): im at 81022 today
———————————————–

Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:57:16 PM): How are we sitting on additional completed sections?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:57:34 PM): ive completed 5
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:57:53 PM): 5 more, or 5 total?
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:51 PM): driss is working on 4
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:54 PM): deb on 1
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:57 PM): total = 10
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:58:59 PM): so far
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 1:59:12 PM): thanks. will talk to amber
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/18/2008 1:59:55 PM): i have bgc meeting rest of day
Chad Masching (Denver) (6/18/2008 2:00:28 PM): enjoy. i became greater yesterday
———————————————–

Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:47 AM): i am not sure if it is top or bottom point
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:53 AM): but whichever it is
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:19:58 AM): i suggest moving it in CAD
Jeffrey Wisniewski (6/27/2008 10:20:04 AM): based on SEEP/CAD section